The World Intellectual Property Congress of the AIPPI is a unique opportunity to meet IP professionals, users from industry and private practice from all over the world. Nearly 1,500 participants attended the last session in Toronto (Canada) where I had the pleasure to present the most recent developments at the EPO, focusing on our new tools, services and projects which aim at making their life easier and improving the quality of our services. Building on the success of previous editions, the AIPPI has decided to increase the frequency of its World IP Congresses (every year as from 2015 onwards), which is a good sign of the dynamism of this association which is one of the oldest – if not the oldest – having started its activities in 1897. The EPO and the AIPPI have reinforced their ties and agreed three years ago to hold a yearly President and Board’s level meeting in order to regularly update each other about our projects and issues.
One of the main purposes of the AIPPI gatherings is to favour the common understanding of IP issues and the approximation of national legal frameworks and practices. Substantive Patent Law Harmonisation was high on the agenda of topics discussed during last week’s session. Different representatives of the patent offices participating to the Tegernsee process reported about the results recently achieved by their experts. Now that there is a broader understanding of the different types of grace period systems, of the importance of 18 month publication or of prior user rights, to name some of these issues, it is up to policy-makers to take the results on board and to resume discussions. I hope the forthcoming meeting of the B+ Group in Geneva will help to support the process.
During numerous informal contacts with the users, I again received many expressions of interest about the coming implementation of the Unitary Patent, and several underlying questions in particular regarding the level of fees. I confirmed the steady progresses made by the Select Committee in charge of the implementation of the UPP on many aspects over the last year. As far as the level of fees is concerned, I understand that early clarification would help the economic actors to fine tune their budgetary projections. However we have still some time to determine the fees as the Unified Patent Court will certainly not start its operations before 2016, and I think it is preferable to thoroughly discuss all the remaining issues in order to reach the widest consensus. I am confident we will find a business friendly solution well in advance, for example by mid-2015.
This AIPPI session was again rich in information and exchanges. I take this opportunity to warmly thank the outgoing AIPPI President, M. John Bochnovic, for his kind invitation to address the AIPPI Congress and our excellent relationships developed during his mandate; and I wish all the best to their newly elected President, M. Felipe Claro.
After the summer break, I am particularly glad to start with a blog reporting on the celebrations for the 95th anniversary of Czech Industrial Property Office which took place last week in Prague in the presence of many personalities, including the Vice-Prime Minister, the Minister for Industry and Trade, the Heads of WIPO, OHIM and […]
When I started my term as EPO President on 1 July 2010, I found a situation of stark contrasts. The Office had evolved successfully over the previous decades as a recognised technical institution, yet in some strategic areas it was facing a crisis of maturity. While some IT tools and services, such as EPOQUE and […]
The European Patent Network is a unique framework of interaction and cooperation, bringing together a regional authority – the European Patent Office – with the national patent offices of the 38 member states of the European Patent Organisation. In addition, closer ties with OHIM have been developed in recent years to present a comprehensive spectrum […]
The latest IP5 Heads and Industry meeting, held last week in Busan, South Korea, was a good opportunity to assess the progress in implementation of our common projects. It was very encouraging to see that some important steps have been achieved within a few years of launching projects or pilots. The EPO presented its component […]
As many of you are aware, the involvement of the EPO in the Patent Cooperation Treaty (the PCT) has always been a matter of first priority for us. Most of our filings are coming via this international plate-form counting 148 Member States and, as one of PCT authorities (ISA), the EPO produced last year almost […]
The PATLIB conference, a yearly event organised since 1990, took place in Istanbul last week. This year’s conference was dedicated to networking, enabling PATLIB representatives to share experiences and best practices. All our member states were represented, with the number of attendees – 260 – far outstripping the previous record total of 180. The conference […]
We recently announced the names of the fifteen finalists for the ninth edition of our European Inventor Award. This annual event honours some of the most brilliant minds who have not only created or made a breakthrough in a particular technological field but who have also used the European patent system to protect their inventions. […]
Last week in Trieste, Italy, I attended two meetings involving patent offices and industry from three regions (Europe, the US and Japan), dedicated to the harmonisation of rules, procedures and practices of the patent system. The first meeting was a further session of the so-called Tegernsee group, composed of heads of Office and experts from […]
On 25 March 2014, a comprehensive study titled “Patents and Standards: A modern framework for IPR-based standardization” was published by a policy consortium known as ECSIP, working for the EU Commission DG Enterprise and Industry. Over the past decade, the relationship between standards and patents has become a subject of lively public debate, particularly in […]